Kulongoski & California Emissions -- a Theory

Robin's Commentary

Is Governor Ted Kulongoski really concerned about the air quality in Oregon?... I have a theory.

It has appeared during Kulongoski's time as governor, that he really has not been in touch with the people of Oregon and has really not done anything for Oregon, then he introduces the idea of joining Washington State by adopting California new vehicle emission standards to reduce greenhouse gases.

The standards state that by 2016, all new cars, SUVs and light trucks sold in the West Coast states would have to comply with tougher standards on emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

Lars Larson has had several experts on his show stating that air quality is not a problem in Oregon, in fact, it is improving. One even stated that as new cars are becoming more efficient, that tighter regulations are unnecessary.

So why is Kulongoski pushing so hard with this issue? Moreover, why is he pushing it now?

Consider this...

Government has a long history of only being concerned about itself and finding ways to make money for its own little pet projects.

It is also a well-known fact that government always has a "wish list" of things that it would like to do if it had the funds to do it.

Let us assume for the moment that you became aware of a large grant that will become available to individual states in the near future from the federal government if you implement certain programs, so not wanting to miss out on this opportunity, you look for ways to get on the list for the money.

Around the time Kulongoski announces his plans for California emissions standards in Oregon, this little article makes the news.

August 10, 2005, President Bush signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU) providing a $6.4 billion in guaranteed funding for federal surface transportation program over six years through FY 2009 including $52.6 billion for federal transit programs-a 46% increase over transit funding guaranteed in TEA 21.

So, what is it? What is the big deal? Who benefits from it?


Here is a summary prepared by The League of American Bicyclists

Surface Transportation Program (STP): 32.5 billion over five years. 10% of these funds are set aside for Transportation Enhancement (TE) activities.


Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) improvement program:
Five year funding set at $8.6 billion. Historically, bicycle and pedestrian projects have accounted for approximately five percent of CMAQ funding, which would mean $430 million over the life of SAFETEA-LU.

... Change. Section 6003 establishes a pilot program under which up to five states may "assume responsibilities for certain projects and programs" including the TE program. The state Department of Transportation would assume the responsibility program administration currently held by the Secretary of transportation.

Congestion Migration in Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program:
Five-year funding set at $8.6 billion. Historically, bicycle and pedestrian projects have accounted for approximately 5% of CMAQ funding, which would mean $430 million over the life of SAFETEA-LU.


Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP):
Significantly increases funding to 5 billion over four years (2006-2009).
Change.... improvement for pedestrian or bicycle safety
Construction of traffic calming feature
Installation and maintenance of fluorescent yellow green pedestrian/bicycle crossing warning signs.


Recreational Trails Program (RTP):
Five-year funding at $370 million. At least 30% must be spent on non-motorized trail projects, which will mean at least $110 million over the life of SAFETEA-LU

A more detailed summary is provided by taxpayers for common sense, which breaks down the funds by state. Oregon

you can come up with your own conclusions.