Thursday, July 09, 2009

Sen. Chuck Schumer :Hopes to have the fundamental building blocks for comprehensive immigration reform by Labor Day

CBS news
Senator Chuck Schumer, in a recent interview, said that he expects to have by Labor Day a comprehensive immigration reform bill that would be more generous to highly skilled immigrant workers then on the lower skilled workers, and would be tougher on the future ways of the illegal immigration.

"I think we'll have a good bill by Labor Day," said Schumer,"I think the fundamental building blocks are in place to do comprehensive immigration reform...We have a shortage maybe of engineers here or Ph.D's in physics, but we probably don't have a shortage of people who can do construction work,"

Schumer encourages legal immigration, and some kind of path for the people who are already here.
amnesty by any other name is still amnesty.
And as for the lack of Ph.D.'s, I have a dog in this one,perhaps, we need look internally at our school system so we could encourage and produce more people with higher education.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Michael Jackson's ghost seen at Neverland


Yup, it had to happen soon. but during an interview on CNN a face appears and again sighted in a hallway.
go to youtube and pause at 3:34 to see the video.

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Today we celebrate the anniversary of the "Declaration of Independence"

Robin's commentary -

Independence Day... otherwise known as the "fourth of July". A day of celebration, picnics, parties and lots and lots of entertaining fireworks.

However, are we celebrating the Fourth of July as a celebration of our independence, or as an excuse to have a day off, get drunk and go watch fireworks?

Personally, I would say that the answer to that question would be the latter. And I'm just as guilty. Even though I do not drink, I do look forward to the extra day off from work.

In fact, until I got older, to be honest, I took the Fourth of July for granted. What it meant and what it really stood for. It really has opened my eyes when I look and see how much my country has changed over the years. I reflect back on the freedoms and personal rights that we take for granted. As I think more about it, I wonder how many people really know what the Declaration of Independence actually is, much less who wrote it and why it came about in the first place.

Wikipedia provides an excellent summary.
The United States Declaration of Independence is a statement adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, which announced that the thirteen American colonies then at war with Great Britain were now independent states, and thus no longer a part of the British Empire. Written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration is a formal explanation of why Congress had voted on July 2 to declare independence from Great Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War. The birthday of the United States of America—Independence Day—is celebrated on July 4, the day the wording of the Declaration was approved by Congress.

the Declaration of Independence... I'm not even sure of its taught in schools these days.

I know the government fears it. To quote, "... That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form,..."

However, the government has learned that people typically have a short memory span and are more concerned about their little lives and don't have time to get involved. Sadly, I too fall into that category, as I struggle day-to-day to maintain a roof over my head and food on the table. Except for this blog, is about the only extent that I'm able to be involved.

We have in our own way created a sense of isolation from the rest of the world. The separation and the illusion of immortality was shattered from the 9/11 attacks. Patriotism was challenged and most came to the calling as America has been known to do in a crisis.

Embarrassing however, were those who are more upset that their TV programs were preempted by the all-day coverage.

The country is under attack? No way, it could not happen to us.

"Borders, language, and culture," the words of sometimes not so popular Michael Savage. However, despite his method of deliverance he speaks the truth.

We have open borders, which threaten our freedom and security. Security for our borders are compared to someone locking the front door of your house and yet leave in the windows wide open.

Our language, which is a version of the English language, is being replaced by, "press one for English" or you must speak a foreign language as a prequalification to deliver auto parts.

Our culture, was a culture that primarily worshiped God in many different forms. One of the freedoms that we have in the United States is to worship or not worship, and to choose what we worship. However, as we see examples time and time again, those freedoms of worship are slowly being taken away and replaced with the more "PC" acceptable types of worship, while ours has become offensive. In fact was not that long ago when we as a nation started celebrating "Cinco de Mayo", which commemorates the Mexicans victory over French forces at the Battle of Puebla, on May 5, 1862.

The Declaration of Independence... think about the true meaning as you pop off another beer and light off another firework.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

— John Hancock"

-- courtesy of US history.org

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Karl Malden dead at 97


Karl Malden who stared in shows like One Eyed Jacks," "Birdman of Alcatraz," "Patton, and those "Don't leave home without it" American Express commercials and 1970s TV show "The Streets of San Francisco," died of natural causes Wednesday surrounded by his family at his Brentwood home.

Rest in Peace Karl"

Picture courtesy of Karlmalden.com

Kulongoski fighting for higher taxes - no surprise there

The Statesman Journal

Ted "tax and gouge me" praised lawmakers for approving higher fuel taxes and vehicle fees for road and bridge work, higher hospital and health-insurer taxes for expanded coverage to 80,000 children and 35,000 more adults, and other items on his 2009 agenda.


Kulongoski also said that he will campaign aggressively for tax increases if opponents are successful in bring it to a vote for increased taxes on corporations and higher income individuals.
"In a time when many states I know of have gone backward, Oregon has had the courage to look to the future," he said the day after lawmakers adjourned their 2009 session..."I will be the first to tell you I do not think Oregon is California," Kulongoski said. "If it fails, I think there's a risk we are going to be like California."


and speaking about dumb...

California IOU System Becomes A Reality

Reuters--
To conserve cash, State Controller John Chiang plans to issue IOUs by Thursday to the state's vendors, local agencies overseeing health programs and various recipients of state aid -- including the elderly and disabled and college students.{More}


IOU's. what business could run on a IOU basis? Not very many.

Of course I am very sure that the state will also accept an IOU for money it is owed as well, right?

Yeah right!

Bottom line, the people really don't have a say on how government spends it's (our)money, however, it is ALWAYS the people that have to pony up to make up the difference.

Monday, June 29, 2009

'Infomercial King' Billy Mays Found Dead in Home

Fox News--

Mays, 50, was found unresponsive by his wife inside his Tampa, Fla., home at 7:45 a.m. on Sunday, according to the Tampa Police Department.

Police said there were no signs of forced entry to Mays' residence and foul play is not suspected. Authorities said an autopsy should be complete by Monday afternoon.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

This will article doesn't particularly pertaining to Oregon, however, it could.

The Montana news station

Bozeman Montana city jobs require you to turn over your username and password of any social online sites that you belong to as part cities background check when applying for work with the city.

The requirement requires the applicant to sign a waiver statement giving the city permission to conduct an investigation in their background.

The issue at hand is the following...
"Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.," the City form states. There are then three lines where applicants can list the Web sites, their user names and log-in information and their passwords."

The city claims that the positions ranging from fire and police all away down to lifeguards requires people of high integrity for those positions.

"You know, I can understand that concern. One thing that's important for folks to understand about what we look for is none of the things that the federal constitution lists as protected things, we don't use those. We're not putting out this broad brush stroke of trying to find out all kinds of information about the person that we're not able to use or shouldn't use in the hiring process," said city attorney Greg Sullivan.

when asked why the city doesn't just create a face book account so they can view the applicant profile, Sullivan said that city officials could explore that option, however this would limit the city to only view the page of the applicant. No one is ever removed his or her name for consideration for a job due to the request, Sullivan continued.

this is one trend that needs to be stopped before it becomes commonplace. I don't care what the job is... my username and password is something I do not share at all.

I would also think that Bozeman would consider some of the following by this request...
#1 it would expose the city to liability of anything that happens in those accounts. Of course, they might argue that since the applicant has given consent to their username and password,that the city was given permission to do whatever they wish to do within someone's account.

#2 the city's argument is that they hire "the highest moral character", I think I would consider this... if somebody does not have an issue of giving over their own personal usernames and passwords, what makes you think that they would not turn over any sensitive city usernames and passwords.

Especially if applying for another job that has the same requirement.

Where is the ACLU on this one?

Friday, June 26, 2009

When does yes mean no and no mean yes?

E-Mail from Lars Larson--

When does yes mean no and no mean yes? The Oregon legislature.

Where democrats plan to pass taxes they know full well won’t pass muster with voters. So they’re pulling a last minute sneaky snakey move. Gut and stuff. That’s where you take one bill…gut everything and stuff in something brand new. Hurry it out of committee. It’s house bill 2414. When voters refer this billion dollar tax hike to the ballot it must now include “overturns legislation” in the ballot title. And the voters won’t be overturning any legislation… because legislation has no legal standing in Oregon if it has been referred to the ballot...and the voters have their say That ought to confuse some. And the law says it must include the phrase “a yes vote rejects legislation that”…and a second statement must include “a no vote approves legislation that”. .Bernie Madoff should have had these scam artists on his staff. Vote yes if you mean no on taxes and vote no if you mean yes.

A gut-and-stuff amendment to House Bill 2414 would overturn Oregon history and practice and sew confusion for Oregon voting on referrals.

The amendment to House Bill 2414 would require that any state measure referred to the people by referendum include the phrase “Overturns Legislation” in the caption. It requires two “understandable” statements of not more than 25 words in the ballot title. One statement would describe the result if the state measure is rejected. It must be worded so that an affirmative vote corresponds to a rejection of the state measure and must begin with the phrase, “A ‘yes’ vote rejects legislation that.” The second statement would describe the result if the state measure is approved and must begin with the phrase, “A ‘no’ vote approves legislation that.”

If you’re not confused by this you’re not paying attention, because the amendment is meant to create a fog of confusion in Oregon’s referendum process.

Currently, a “yes” means “yes” to the issue that the people are deciding in their legislative capacity – the imposition of a tax or an environmental regulation or deregulation – and a “no” means “no” on the issue. “Yes” means acceptance of the legislative proposal; no means rejection of the legislative proposal.

The mischievous amendment to House Bill 2414 overturns both Oregon history and elemental logic in one fell swoop. The guiding principle of Oregon’s referral system has always been that a piece of legislation has no standing if it is immediately referred to voters. Only the voters give it standing and lock a referred measure into Oregon law. That’s why a referendum does not go into effect until voters have had their say at the ballot box. It cannot be overturned because, unlike a legislation that is not referred, it has never been established in law.

The proposed amendment to House Bill 2414 would change this.

“Yes” will mean “no” and “no” will mean “yes”— an affirmative vote will mean rejection and a negative vote will mean approval -- under the proposed amendment, and confusion will reign.

This confusion may work to one side’s advantage on a particular issue, but just as easily work to its disadvantage on the next issue. What’s good referral politics in one political season can be bad politics in another. The current legislature may want to increase taxes; the next legislature may want to strip protection for the Metolius River.

The proposed amendment to House Bill 2414 uses the words “simple and understandable” but the amendment would establish a complicated and obscure ballot on voter referenda and referrals. What this legislature should focus on is consistency and clarity.


Citing a 2001 Oregon Supreme Court opinion, the Attorney General’s Office wrote that a ballot title “complies substantially” with Oregon law “if it identifies the subject matter of a proposed measure in terms that will not confuse or mislead voters.” The Attorney General’s Office made this statement in the context of approving a 2003 referendum petition in which a “yes” vote enacts a legislatively-passed income-tax surcharge and a “no” vote retains existing income-tax rates.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Michael Jackson dead at 50

Fox news --

Michael Jackson died Thursday afternoon at a Los Angeles hospital.

There are reports that Michael Jackson had gone into cardiac arrest although official cause of death wasn't immediately known.

it always comes in threes -- rest in peace

Ed McMahon and Farrah Fawcett

The New York Times --

Farrah Fawcett
died on Thursday in Santa Monica, California
She was 62 and had been battling cancer since late 2006.


The New York Times
Ed McMahon
Ed McMahon, who steadfastly introduced Johnny Carson through the host’s nearly 30 year run on “The Tonight Show,” died Tuesday morning, NBC said. Mr. McMahon was 86