Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Jim Crow Segregation Raises Its Ugly Head Again, But This Time with Different Actors

We’re in Danger of Repeating History Again

Jim Crow Segregation Raises Its Ugly Head Again, But This Time with Different Actors

Commentary by Robin Wonders

Once again, we find ourselves watching history repeat—but with new faces playing familiar roles. Back in the Jim Crow era, it was about race. Segregated bathrooms, separate water fountains, laws that pushed Black Americans into second-class citizenship. Today, it’s happening again—but the target has shifted. Now, it’s transgender, intersex, and gender-diverse people caught in the crosshairs.

With Trump’s black-and-white approach to gender, we’re heading back into dangerous territory. His policies erase the existence of anyone who doesn’t fit neatly into “male” or “female.” But let’s be clear—transgender and intersex people have existed for as long as humans have been around. They aren’t new. They aren’t some modern invention. They’ve just lived their lives quietly, without feeling the need to broadcast it—until now, when their rights are being attacked.

It’s not the legitimate trans community causing the uproar. It’s the squeaky wheels—the ones who aren’t medically diagnosed, haven’t gone through any process, and treat gender identity like a costume they can throw on when convenient. These are the individuals who jump into women’s sports or make headlines for all the wrong reasons. If they were truly transgender, they’d be living the life. They’d be following the guidelines of WPATH—the World Professional Association for Transgender Health—which has set the standards for gender-affirming care for decades.

Gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition, listed in the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). But don’t let the word disorder fool you. This isn’t about being “mentally unstable.” The medical community has been treating gender-diverse individuals for over a century, going back to the early Harry Benjamin Standards of Care in the 1960s. The WPATH guidelines today reflect a more compassionate, science-based approach that recognizes not everyone fits the same mold.

But Trump’s policies, and the attitudes they inspire, don’t care about the science. They don’t care about the real people who are just trying to live their lives in peace. It’s about forcing everyone back into rigid boxes, even if it means putting people at risk—just like Jim Crow laws did. Back then, it was "separate but equal." Now, it’s “you don’t belong here unless you fit my definition of male or female.”

And it’s not just about bathrooms or sports. It’s about survival.

In healthcare, this kind of black-and-white thinking can be dangerous—even life-threatening. Many transgender and intersex individuals face denial of routine medical care because their documentation doesn’t match their biology. Imagine being told you can’t get a mammogram because your records say “male,” even though you have breasts. 

These rigid systems don’t just erase identities—they endanger lives. This isn’t about special treatment. It’s about receiving the right care for your body, regardless of how the government, an insurance company, or a set of outdated policies tries to define you. When healthcare providers are forced to follow black-and-white rules that ignore the spectrum of human experience, people fall through the cracks.

Just like Jim Crow laws once denied Black Americans access to equal facilities and services, these gender policies deny people the basic right to proper medical care.

This isn’t hypothetical. It’s happening.

Lynn Conway, a pioneering computer scientist and transgender woman, made groundbreaking contributions to microchip design at IBM—work that laid the foundation for modern computing. Her legacy reminds us that transgender individuals have always been integral to progress.

Rep. Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender member of Congress, faced discrimination shortly after her election. House Republicans introduced a rule requiring members to use restrooms that correspond with their sex assigned at birth, effectively barring McBride from women’s facilities. She now must use a “neutral” bathroom, just like the “colored only” restrooms during Jim Crow. Yet McBride doesn’t waver, stating: “I'm not here to fight about bathrooms, I'm here to fight for Delawareans and to bring down costs facing families.”

Yes, there are those who pretend to be women. But there are also people who fully understand their biology, living with a legitimate, medically diagnosed condition. In every interview I’ve watched with trans individuals, they acknowledge the truth: they know they aren’t biological women or men. They know they’re different. But they represent themselves as such because it’s how they survive in a world that often won’t accept them otherwise. They respect the differences. They’re not trying to erase biology—they’re just asking for the space to live their lives without constant fear or judgment.

But if this black-and-white thinking continues, we risk opening the door to a Jim Crow-style society once more—with separate bathrooms and drinking fountains. Different names. Same oppression.

Monday, February 17, 2025

Oregon Expands Food Stamps for Any Immigration Status—Yet Retired Americans Get $39?

 

Oregon Expands Food Stamps for Any Immigration Status—Yet Retired Americans Get $39?

If you've been following Oregon’s latest policy changes, you may have heard about Senate Bill 611, which expands food stamp eligibility to immigrants regardless of their legal status. According to Oregon Catalyst, this means that non-citizens—who may not have contributed to the system in the same way as tax-paying residents—could now receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

Now, here’s where it gets frustrating: As a retired American, we qualify for only $39 in food stamps.

Where’s the Fairness?

We worked, paid taxes, and contributed to society for decades. Yet when retirement comes, the system we helped fund seems to turn its back on us. Meanwhile, lawmakers are opening up benefits to people who haven’t necessarily put into the system in the same way. How is this fair to retirees living on fixed incomes?

  • The cost of food is skyrocketing.
  • Rent and utilities are eating away at Social Security checks.
  • Medical expenses don’t get any cheaper as we age.

Yet, somehow, the government thinks that $39 a month is enough for a retiree to survive? That won’t even cover a single trip to the grocery store.

A Pattern of Priorities?

This isn’t just about immigration—it’s about the constant prioritization of new programs over helping the people already here who need it. Time and time again, we see funding go toward expanding benefits for non-citizens, special interest groups, or administrative bloat, while those who spent their lives working get table scraps.

Why is it that politicians will bend over backward to create new entitlements for others while barely maintaining support for the very people who built this country?

Should We Just Stay Silent?

This is exactly why I’m considering reviving my blog—because Facebook isn’t the best place for real discussions anymore. There’s too much censorship, too many algorithms controlling what people see, and too little real conversation.

So here’s my question to you: Should I start writing again outside of Facebook? Would you read, share, and help bring attention to issues like this?

Because I don’t know about you, but I’m getting real tired of being told to "tighten my belt" while politicians hand out benefits like candy to everyone but the people who worked for them.